Caught between Additive Manufacturing and traditional manufacturing methods? Use our Digital Part Analysis tool to make a financially savvy decision for your business.
The Digital Part Analyser helps to determine if Additive Manufacturing or a traditional manufacturing method is more suitable for the manufacturing process of your product.
The solution is built with AI technology to quickly analyse and recommend the right technology and materials from its vast internal library. Digital Part Analysis is suitable in low volume high complexity parts production. We provide you the detailed technical analysis from a single individual CAD file to full-blown CAD assembly BOM files or an inventory list containing a combination of thousands of parts.
The Digital Parts Analyser can be used to identify adjacent parts resulting in less complex assemblies and lower inventory management costs.
The analysis allows for better decision making to calculate whether it makes financial sense to manufacture using 3D printing processes.
Identifies parts that are good candidates for 3D printing, saving time (extremely short lead time for parts) and costs (cheaper than using molds/casting for parts with small quantities).
Automatically analyse your full CAD assemble (B.O.M or Inventory List).
Comprehensive material, technology & lead time analysis between AM vs CNC & Injection Molding.
Able to accurately identify any parts consolidation opportunities.
Able to suggest geometry changes to suit AM printability.
Breakdown of financial analysis between AM Break Even Point vs Traditional Manufacturing Method.
Digital Part Analysis helped a global fastening products manufacturer save their lead time from 8 weeks to 9 days and decrease the cost by 50% for a critical production line manufacturing parts by switching to Additive Manufacturing.